Vivo X300 Pro Cameras Fly High in DXOMARKs Overall Camera Ratings

At the moment, one of the best camera smartphones on the market is the Vivo X300 Pro. So we chose this phone as our choice for the best camera phone of 2025. DXOMARK also ranked the Vivo X300 Pro, which is second on its list of companies.

The Vivo X300 Pro cameras have received high praise from DXOMARK

DXOMARK compared the cameras of the Vivo X300 Pro, which is now second only to the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra on that list. DXOMARK did not review all the flagship camera phones out there, however, and still re-examined each of these cameras (although it was also noted by DxOMARC) that they were “as far as we know.”

The Vivo X300 Pro has 171 points, while the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra reached 175 points in the camera department (in comparison to its 170 points) and the Vive pura80 Ultra had 171. 168 points, the third-placed OPPO Find X8 Ultra (as opposed to iPhone 17 Pro) is. Currently, DXOMARK has not reviewed the OPPO Find X9 Pro.

Another 5th-placed Vivo phone, the VIvo X200 Ultra is also on top of another Vive phone and 6nd was the HONOR Magic 8 Pro. You can check out a list of DXOMARK’s best camera phones here.

There are a lot of positives here

The company had a lot of good things to say about the phone when it comes to the Vivo X300 Pro. But there are also some ‘cons’, though it is not a complete lack of ‘con’. What is the first thing to say about the positives, shall we?

DXOMARK (left) praised the target exposure on the phone, saying ‘It’s true and stable with a wide dynamic range. By the way, that’s for both photo and video modes of .

The praise for skin tone rendering was also given, as it’s ‘pleasant with neutral white balance in photo and video. Also, ” DXOMARK said ‘The phone is very detailed in all situations with almost no visible noise in photo mode.

Similarly, Tele zoom has good details and the bokeh mode is excellent. Among these positives also was the fact that one of the negatives in video mode was sufficient stabilization.

DXOMARK did highlight some ‘cons’ as well

How would you describe the ‘cons’? Well, DXOMARK said ‘Skin tones on the deep model can be slightly unnatural and just over-stuffy. In low light, it can also be seen as well for unnatural details rendering (especially in a dark-light environment).

Strong backlit scenes were characterized by contrast issues with the use of s in strong back lit scenes. A small cast of light white balance is sometimes seen, as are some slight variations of . Texture artifacts such as scene integrity, for example, can be visible in very difficult situations.

Other artifacts, including ghosting and color fringer-finging (sometimes visible) were also mentioned in DXOMARK. company, says ultrawide field of view is not wide enough.

Also see our full Vivo X300 Pro review to know about the phone and its cameras.

Thanks for reading Vivo X300 Pro Cameras Fly High in DXOMARKs Overall Camera Ratings